• Printer Friendly
  • Text Resizer - Small
  • Text Resizer - Large
  • Email this page

Adverse drug reactions: Who keeps track?Adverse drug reactions: Who keeps track?

Subscribe to MedicinesTalk

Australia has a comprehensive system for regulating and monitoring medicines to ensure their safety. One component of the system is a process for collating and analysing information about adverse reactions to medicines.

Sketch of a business man reading documents

Adverse reactions

All medicines can have undesirable and unintended  effects. These effects are known as side effects or adverse reactions. Most adverse reactions to ‘old’ medicines are well known because the medicines have been used for many years. However, our knowledge about adverse reactions to ‘new’ medicines is often incomplete.

In Australia, all prescription medicines must undergo a comprehensive evaluation of their safety and effectiveness before being marketed. The more common adverse reactions are usually detected during the clinical trials that form part of the evaluation process. However, uncommon  reactions may not show up during clinical trials, because the trials are not usually large enough  or long enough for every reaction to appear. In addition, clinical trials may not involve people who are taking medicines for other conditions, so some interactions may not show up during trials.

darkgreen_line

 The main reason for reporting adverse reactions is to increase the safety of medicines
by increasing the body of knowledge about them.

darkgreen_line

Adverse reactions can have marked effects on people’s health. Therefore, it is important that we have a system for collating and disseminating information about adverse reactions that appear when a medicine is in general use. In Australia, the responsibility for this task lies with a committee of medical experts known as ADRAC (Australian Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee).

Reporting process

The reporting process usually starts with the GP, pharmacist or hospital managing the consumer thought to have experienced an adverse reaction. If they feel that the suspected reaction warrants reporting, they submit the details of the medicine and the reaction to ADRAC. About 10,000 suspected reactions are reported each year. Two thirds of the reports come from GPs and hospitals.

Every suspected adverse reaction report is reviewed by professional staff, who enter the details into the national database of adverse reactions. The database, which dates from 1972, contains the details of over 182,000 reports. The details are then analysed to see if the report may contain a medicine-related safety issue. If an issue is identified, the record is comprehensively  analysed to determine if the reported reaction is a real adverse reaction or not. ADRAC meets  eight times a year to discuss the reports received.

What happens to a report after the review process is complete depends on its importance and its safety implications. If the reaction is well known and not serious, nothing further may be done. If the report raises further questions or possible concerns, more information may be sought, or ADRAC may decide to wait and see if other similar reports are submitted.

If the adverse reaction is new and significant, steps may be taken to amend the official information about the medicine (known as the Product Information), change the medicine’s labelling, or inform doctors, pharmacists and consumers about the reaction and its implications. In the case of more serious reactions, restrictions may be imposed on the availability and use of the medicine. In some cases, it may even be taken off the Australian market. Fortunately, this needs to happen only rarely. 

Priority areas

The main reason for collecting and analysing reports of adverse drug reactions is to improve the safety of medicines by increasing the body of knowledge about adverse reactions and identifying potentially dangerous situations. Therefore, most of ADRAC’s efforts are directed towards reports likely to achieve those goals, rather than trying to document thoroughly every adverse reaction experienced. Reports of reactions to new medicines, serious reactions and interactions between medicines are strongly encouraged. Every issue of ADRAC’s regular bulletin includes the ‘Drugs of Current Interest’, which is a list of medicines of particular interest to ADRAC. Doctors and pharmacists are asked to report all suspected adverse reactions to medicines on the list. The information gathered about reactions and interactions strengthens and augments the body of knowledge about medicines.

Reporting your reactions

You can contribute to the process of adding to the body of knowledge about medicines by telling your doctor about any adverse reactions you think you may have experienced. The information may help your doctor better understand you and your situation, give them a better understanding of the medicine and its effects, and give them the opportunity to report the reaction to ADRAC. Reporting an adverse reaction also gives you and your doctor the opportunity to discuss the reaction and its implications. This may enable your doctor to alleviate the problem by changing the medicine, modifying the dose, or suggesting another solution. It may also give your doctor greater insight into your health problem, which may enable them to modify and improve your management.

An example of the system in action: Celebrex

Celecoxib (Celebrex) became available for the treatment of arthritis in Australia in October 1999. It was put on the ADRAC ‘Drugs of Current Interest’ list for two years. Health professionals responded by submitting nearly 3000 suspected adverse reaction reports in that time. The reports enabled ADRAC to develop a comprehensive adverse reactions profile for the medicine. The resulting profile confirmed ADRAC’s initial impression that the adverse reactions of celecoxib were similar to those of other anti-inflammatory arthritis medicines*, except that serious gastro-intestinal effects** were less common. ADRAC kept health professionals informed of this knowledge through a series of articles in its bulletin and the Medical Journal of Australia. Recently, ADRAC changed its advice about celecoxib. In the August 2003 issue of its bulletin, it discussed the several hundred reports it had received of gastro-intestinal ulcers and bleeding during celecoxib treatment. Based on these reports and the clinical trial results, it concluded by saying that celecoxib should be used with the same caution as other antiinflammatory arthritis medicines. This example shows how Australia’s system for reporting and analysing suspected adverse reactions to medicines can strengthen and change the body of knowledge about a medicine. Some clinical trials of celecoxib indicated that it had fewer serious gastrointestinal effects than other anti-inflammatory arthritis medicines. The first two years of reporting appeared to confirm that picture. It was not until the medicine had been used by many thousands of consumers for long periods that a better understanding of the serious gastro-intestinal effects of the medicine emerged. As a result, the hope that celecoxib would be much less likely to cause gastrointestinal ulcers and bleeding than other antiinflammatory arthritis medicines seems not to have been fulfilled. 

* The other anti-inflammatory arthritis medicines include naproxen (Anaprox, Inza, Naprosyn, Naprosyn SR, Naprogesic, Proxen SR) and diclofenac (Diclohexal, Voltaren, Voltaren Rapid).
** Serious gastro-intestinal effects include stomach and duodenal ulcers, and stomach and duodenal bleeding.
 

MedicinesTalk is a free quarterly newsletter for consumers written by consumers about using medicines wisely. Subscribe to the hard copy version using our online ordering system, or write to MedicinesTalk, National Prescribing Service Limited, PO Box 1147, Strawberry Hills, NSW 2012.

Date published: 2003-08-01 00:00:00

Reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the date of creation. This information is not intended as a substitute for medical advice from a qualified health professional. Health professionals should rely on their own expertise and enquiries when providing medical advice or treatment. Where permitted by law, NPS disclaims all liability (including for negligence) for any loss, damage or injury resulting from reliance on or use of this information. Read our full disclaimer.

References to brands should not be taken as an endorsement by NPS.