For consumers
(1300 633 424)
Mon-Fri | 9am-5pm AEST
Your call will be answered by healthdirect Australia
For health professionals
Find out the active ingredient and other brand names of your medicines with the NPS Medicine Name Finder
For a medicinewise Australia
Independent. Not-for-profit. Evidence based.

Most smokers who are considering quitting — and 40% say they think about it at least once a day — name health as the reason.[1] The health reasons are particularly compelling for smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), given that nothing else slows the progression of airflow limitation to the same degree as quitting (Figure 1).[2]
Advice and encouragement from health professionals has assisted many people to give up smoking.[1]
Use the 5As approach. After Asking about smoking status and gaining permission to discuss the subject further, give brief, non-confrontational Advice about the risks of smoking and the benefits of quitting. Assess if smokers are motivated to quit, by asking “are you ready to stop smoking now?”[3]
A smoker is likely to be dependent on nicotine when they:
Regardless of whether smokers are ready to quit, unsure about quitting, or not ready to quit in the near future, health professionals can offer brief, useful assistance. See NPS News 50 for suggestions.
Unplanned quit attempts are very common and often successful. Advice from a health professional can be a trigger, even for people who are apparently not ready to quit.[1,4]
See NPS News 68 for links to resources and support for health professionals and patients.
Discuss the suitability of smoking cessation drugs and counselling support for the individual’s circumstances.
Most smokers choose to quit without pharmacotherapy and many succeed. However, be aware that smokers may not readily seek effective help if they believe they should be able to quit without any assistance.[1]
Inform smokers who are nicotine dependent that smoking cessation drugs, including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), can roughly double the odds of success and are particularly effective if used with support to prevent relapse (e.g. Arranging follow-up from the practice).[5]
Studies have found a benefit of brief or intensive counselling, with or without concomitant use of smoking cessation drugs.[6]
Practice nurses can give effective smoking cessation advice while reducing GP workload.[7,8]
Internet-based support programs have not been studied extensively, but there is some evidence that they can increase quit rates.[9]
Telephone counselling services, including Quitline, have demonstrated effectiveness.[10] The Quitline active callback service is based on the smoker’s planned quit schedule. In 1 study, 14% of those using the callback service were not smoking at 12 months, compared with 11% of those who participated only in patient-initiated calls.[11] Quitline staff can advise smokers about other support options, including local quit courses and groups.
Choose a smoking cessation drug after considering individual circumstances and preferences, contraindications, adverse effects, previous experience with pharmacotherapy, cost, convenience and efficacy.[12]
Varenicline produced superior quit rates to bupropion in several clinical trials, but indirect comparisons between varenicline and NRT have not found a clear difference.[13] In the only direct comparison, more people using varenicline were continually abstinent after 3 months (56%) than with NRT patches (43%). However, at 1 year the difference was no longer statistically significant (26% vs 20%, p=0.06).[14]
There is no evidence that bupropion or varenicline is effective without counselling and support. Participants in the key varenicline trials received up to 10 minutes per week of face-to-face counselling during the 12-week treatment phase.[15,16] Without support, patients may find it difficult to persist with treatment for the full course and may relapse more readily.
NRT has been shown to increase quit rates with or without counselling. However, the combination of NRT and counselling is more effective than either component individually.[17]
Smokers who have used smoking cessation drugs unsuccessfully may benefit from trying a different drug or a combination of products. However, NRT may still be useful on a repeat attempt.[17] Reassure patients that it usually takes several attempts to quit successfully — an average of 4 in a recent survey.[1]
For people considering NRT, discuss using a combination of dosage forms. Gum, tablets or lozenges may be useful in response to urges to smoke, while patches maintain steady nicotine levels. The combination of patch and lozenge yielded greater long-term abstinence than monotherapy with bupropion or nicotine patch in 2 recent trials.[18,19] High strength nicotine products may be more appropriate for smokers with a high degree of nicotine dependence.
It is unclear if the combination of NRT and bupropion is more effective than either treatment alone; trials have had mixed results.[18–20] The safety and efficacy of varenicline in combination with bupropion or NRT has not been established.
At least 1 in 6 people with COPD continues to smoke and can benefit from cessation advice.[21,22]
Consider a diagnosis of COPD for any current or ex-smoker over the age of 35 years with breathlessness, chronic cough or sputum production.[23]
Spirometric assessment is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of COPD and to select optimal therapy. Irreversible airflow limitation is defined as a post-bronchodilator FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second) < 80% predicted, and an FEV1 to FVC (forced vital capacity) ratio < 0.7.[2,23]
A large acute improvement in spirometry after inhaled bronchodilators suggests a diagnosis of asthma, i.e. an increase in FEV1 of ≥ 400 mL.[2,23]
Repeated spirometry is recommended annually as part of regular review, to quantify symptom control and the effects of treatment.[24]
Use an inhaled short-acting beta2 agonist or short-acting anticholinergic as needed.[2,23,24] Options are either:
There is limited evidence for using tiotropium in mild COPD.[25]
People who remain breathless or have exacerbations while using a short-acting bronchodilator as needed should add a regular long-acting bronchodilator.[2,23,24] Regular dosing of a short-acting bronchodilator or combinations of short-acting bronchodilators are less effective than a regular long-acting bronchodilator and are no longer recommended.[2]
Options are either:
Alternatively, for people with FEV1 ≤ 50% and ≥ 2 exacerbations in the past 12 months, a fixed-dose combination inhaler is also an option, use either:
See NPS News 68 for further options for intensifying treatment.
A- Single-ingredient inhalers containing either salmeterol or eformoterol are not PBS listed for COPD.
B- Fluticasone with salmeterol (Seretide 250/25 MD and Seretide 500/50 DPI strengths only) is PBS listed for COPD in people with FEV1 < 50% predicted who have a history of repeated exacerbations despite regular beta2 agonist treatment.
C- Budesonide with eformoterol (Symbicort) is not PBS listed for COPD.
Review is recommended 4–8 weeks after changing or stepping up therapy, as well as annually for people with mild to moderate COPD and twice yearly for people with severe COPD.[23,24]
Many people with COPD use their long-acting inhaled medication irregularly.[22] Self-management education (see below) may help to improve adherence to drug therapy.
Long-acting bronchodilators should have a noticeable effect on symptoms, daily activities or exercise capacity within 4–8 weeks; improvements can occur without changes in FEV1.[23] Lack of response to inhaled therapies in COPD is common and a prompt review allows the best therapy option to be found.
It may be difficult to assess the response to inhaled corticosteroids, as an effect on exacerbation rates may only be apparent after 6 months or so.[23]
Ask patients to bring their inhalers to review appointments so they can demonstrate their inhaler technique. Ability to use an inhaler can decline within 2 months of first instruction.[26]
Inform people whose day-to-day life is affected by COPD symptoms about available pulmonary rehabilitation programs.
Pulmonary rehabilitation reduces dyspnoea and fatigue, improves exercise capacity, and has a positive effect on mood and quality of life.[2] Programs include elements such as exercise training, education, and assistance with smoking cessation.
Pulmonary rehabilitation is contraindicated for people who are unable to walk, have unstable angina or who have had a recent myocardial infarction.[24,26]
The Australian Lung Foundation lists pulmonary rehabilitation programs by location on their website or can provide advice by telephone on 1800 654 301.
COPD action plans and other forms of self-management education can enable people with COPD to recognise and react appropriately to an exacerbation of their symptoms, for example by self-initiating antibiotics or oral corticosteroids.[27,28]
There has been insufficient research to determine whether self-management improves morbidity or mortality. Some forms of self-management education have been shown to reduce hospital admissions.[27,28]
A/Prof John Litt
Department of General Practice
Flinders University, Adelaide
Prof Paul Seale, Professor of Clinical Pharmacology
University of Sydney, Sydney
Date published: 2010-05-01 00:00:00
Reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the date of creation. This information is not intended as a substitute for medical advice from a qualified health professional. Health professionals should rely on their own expertise and enquiries when providing medical advice or treatment. Where permitted by law, NPS disclaims all liability (including for negligence) for any loss, damage or injury resulting from reliance on or use of this information. Read our full disclaimer.
References to brands should not be taken as an endorsement by NPS.