For consumers
(1300 633 424)
Mon-Fri | 9am-5pm AEST
Your call will be answered by healthdirect Australia
For health professionals
Find out the active ingredient and other brand names of your medicines with the NPS Medicine Name Finder
For a medicinewise Australia
Independent. Not-for-profit. Evidence based.

2 March 2009
Research conducted by the National Prescribing Service Limited (NPS) has found that while most clinical software systems pick up important drug interactions, improvements need to be made to ensure doctors and pharmacists do not become desensitised to prompts and alerts.
The study, published in the latest edition of the Medical Journal of Australia, looked at six prescribing software systems commonly used by GPs, three dispensing software systems commonly used by pharmacists and a range of drug interactions reference sources.
While most systems picked up the 20 clinically important drug interactions and all gave alerts for 2 potentially life-threatening interactions, they provided little or no information on clinical effects of the interaction and advice on management.
“GPs and pharmacists need to be aware of the limitations of the decision support features in software systems, including the quality and source of the underlying evidence,” Dr Lynn Weekes, NPS CEO, said.
“Deficiencies in drug interaction decision support can impede the quality use of medicines, both in terms of individual patient management and more broadly by causing “alert fatigue”, desensitising users to prompts and alerts.”
Previous NPS
research showed that some GPs and pharmacists were dissatisfied with the drug
interaction alerts in their systems, citing too many alerts, and concerns about
comprehensiveness and accuracy.
“We believe what users need is more information about the clinical effects of an interaction and advice on patient management, fewer alerts about minor interactions, and clearer presentation. We know that some software vendors have already taken steps to improve their systems and we congratulate them on this,” Dr Weekes said.
The lack of national guidelines or standards for pharmaceutical decision support tools has been identified as one reason why there are inconsistencies and limitations in Australian systems.
“The Government has identified the need for national standards for decision support in clinical software in its National e-Health Strategy. We agree that this would make it easier for software vendors to improve the quality of their systems, and enable greater consistency between systems,” Dr Weekes said.
“We have been and will continue to work with drug information publishers, software vendors, pharmacists and GPs, and the Medical Software Industry Association. The outcomes of this and future research will enable us to make recommendations for features that should be in software to support quality and safety.”
ENDS
The National Prescribing Service Limited (NPS) is an independent, non-profit organisation for Quality Use of Medicines funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.
Media enquiries
Contact us
Date published: 2009-03-02 19:00:00
Reasonable care is taken to provide accurate information at the date of creation. This information is not intended as a substitute for medical advice from a qualified health professional. Health professionals should rely on their own expertise and enquiries when providing medical advice or treatment. Where permitted by law, NPS disclaims all liability (including for negligence) for any loss, damage or injury resulting from reliance on or use of this information. Read our full disclaimer.
References to brands should not be taken as an endorsement by NPS.