Maintenance treatments for bipolar disorders
- David I Pyle, Philip B Mitchell
- Aust Prescr 2007;30:70-3
- 1 June 2007
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2007.041
Bipolar disorders are disabling and, for most patients, recurrent illnesses. Lithium is the 'gold standard' mood stabiliser in terms of efficacy, but many patients find it difficult to tolerate. The anticonvulsants sodium valproate and carbamazepine are useful despite minimal controlled evidence for their prophylactic efficacy. The approval of olanzapine and lamotrigine for maintenance treatment increases the choice of drug therapy. These new drugs, in conjunction with the development of effective psychological interventions, mean that the clinician has an increasing range of effective options to offer patients with these disabling and challenging conditions.
Bipolar disorders (see box) are relatively common conditions with a lifetime prevalence of up to 4%.1 They lead to levels of disability which are greater than those associated with major depressive disorder (unipolar depression).2 Rates of disrupted relationships are high and many sufferers are unemployed and in receipt of government benefits. At least a quarter have a history of suicide attempts, with 10-20% of all patients ending their life by their own hand.
While effective and rapid management of acute episodes of mania and bipolar depression are critical components of treatment, the prevention of relapse is probably the most important aspect of management. Bipolar disorders are highly recurrent for most patients. It is the recurring nature of the condition that, unless adequately treated, gradually takes its toll in terms of the patient's capacity to maintain relationships, career and self-esteem. The average patient experiences a major relapse every 17 to 30 months, with episodes frequently lasting between three and six months. At least 25% will go through phases of rapid-cycling illness in which they experience at least four episodes in a year.3
The challenge for the treating clinician - be that a general practitioner4 or psychiatrist - is to ensure adequate long-term control of the illness. Effective maintenance treatment can make an enormous difference to the lives of those with bipolar disorders. The benefits observed can be some of the most dramatic seen in medical practice.
There are different guidelines, but the basic principle is that most patients with recurrent, severe or disabling illness are highly likely to benefit from prophylactic treatment. Usually (but not always) the maintenance treatment will be a continuation of the drug that was effective for acute treatment (Table 1). Some of these drugs are currently not subsidised for maintenance treatment (Table 2).
Although lithium was first discovered to be effective in mania in 1949, by the Melbourne psychiatrist John Cade, it is still the 'gold standard' therapy. Despite the intervening 58 years, no treatments of greater potency have yet been developed. Many patients are unable to tolerate lithium and it has limited effectiveness for the depressive phase of bipolar disorders.
There are more positive randomised double-blind controlled trials for lithium as a maintenance therapy than for any other treatment. Several meta-analyses have confirmed the efficacy of lithium, particularly in preventing manic relapse.5 Its capacity to prevent depressive relapse is less clear-cut. Consequently, many patients on lithium suffer from frequent and prolonged depressive episodes, despite dramatic suppression of the periods of elevated mood. Non-compliance is common (20-50% of patients) and if lithium is abruptly discontinued, the chance of sudden relapse into mania is considerable.
The main drawbacks of lithium are the need for serum concentration monitoring, the possibility of serious toxicity, and the risk of thyroid (and less commonly renal) impairment. Tremors, increased muscle tone, hyper-reflexia and disorientation are signs of severe toxicity.
In Australia sodium valproate is an anticonvulsant drug that is approved for acute treatment of mania. It is also commonly used as an alternative to lithium for maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders. Carbamazepine, another anticonvulsant, is approved for the management of mania and the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder.
The only placebo-controlled trial of carbamazepine in prophylaxis failed to show superiority over placebo. However, most of the five randomised double-blind comparisons with lithium reported no difference between lithium and carbamazepine. There has been only one double-blind trial of sodium valproate in the prophylaxis of bipolar disorders. This found no differences between either valproate or lithium when compared to placebo.6 Despite this lack of evidence from controlled trials, clinical experience worldwide has seemed to confirm the benefit of these drugs in reducing relapse rates.
Lamotrigine is an anticonvulsant that may also be used in Australia for the prevention of bipolar depressive episodes. This indication is not subsidised by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). There is evidence from one placebo-controlled trial for the efficacy of lamotrigine in the acute treatment of bipolar depression, but this was not replicated in several subsequent trials. Lamotrigine is neither acutely nor prophylactically effective in unipolar depression. It is not significantly superior to placebo in the acute treatment of mania.
In two trials of maintenance treatment involving 638 patients with bipolar I disorder over 18 months, lamotrigine was superior to placebo in the prevention of depressive episodes, while lithium was more effective than placebo in the prevention of mania.7 A pooled analysis of both studies showed that lamotrigine was more effective than placebo for preventing depression, and lithium was more effective for mania. It also showed that lamotrigine was statistically more effective than placebo in the prevention of manic episodes, but this appeared to be of limited clinical significance8
The main safety problem with lamotrigine is serious rash. The development of Stevens-Johnson syndrome is a major concern as it may be fatal. Major risk factors for serious rash are rapid dose escalation and failure to reduce the dose of lamotrigine on co-administration with sodium valproate.
Olanzapine was superior to lithium in the prevention of manic and mixed episodes and equivalent to lithium for reducing bipolar depressive episodes even in the absence of psychosis. As yet, no other studies have confirmed that olanzapine has greater efficacy than lithium in preventing manic relapse.
At present there are few reports about the long-term preventive efficacy of other atypical antipsychotics, although the effect of olanzapine may turn out to be a class effect. Risperidone has been approved in Australia for continuation for six months following acute treatment of mania.
The major safety concerns with olanzapine and some other atypical antipsychotics are substantial weight gain, hyperlipidaemia and diabetes. During long-term treatment with olanzapine, lipids and glucose should be monitored, and active means instituted to encourage diet and exercise.
There is minimal evidence to support the use of combinations of drugs for maintenance treatment. The main evidence comes from a study in the 1990s which found that patients unresponsive to monotherapy with lithium or anticonvulsants often responded to combined therapies. The effective combinations were lithium and carbamazepine, and lithium and valproate.10
For many patients, the episodes of mania are relatively easily treated, but depressive episodes are frequently less amenable to treatment. There is currently considerable controversy internationally over adding long-term antidepressants to the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorders. Antidepressants may induce manic episodes or even a rapid-cycling pattern, but the frequency of this is debated as there is some evidence that suggests induction of mania is relatively uncommon. There is some evidence that continuing antidepressants in patients who respond acutely to them has a prophylactic benefit. In one study 70% of the patients who stopped their antidepressants early relapsed into depression, compared to 36% of the patients who continued their antidepressants.11 Some (particularly US) authorities argue that antidepressants should rarely be used in long-term treatment.
Strong evidence for the benefits of psychological interventions in reducing the likelihood of relapse (particularly depressive episodes) is accumulating from a series of randomised controlled trials. Educational techniques, empowering the patient to take responsibility for the management of their illness, have been shown to reduce relapse and improve social functioning and employment. Cognitive therapy is aimed at improving skills in managing stress and symptoms, and in identifying early warning signs of impending relapse, and teaching skills to challenge and alter unhelpful thinking styles.12 It improves mood, coping and adherence, and reduces recurrence.13 Interpersonal and social rhythm therapy teaches patients to regulate their social habits, sleep patterns and daily routines at times of stress.14
New treatments, in conjunction with the development of effective psychological interventions for bipolar disorders, mean that the clinician has an increasing range of effective maintenance therapies to offer patients with these disabling and challenging conditions. While none of the newer drugs has been shown to be more effective than lithium, they are better tolerated by some patients.
Mood Disorders Unit Registrar, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney
Consultant Psychiatrist, Prince of Wales Hospital and Black Dog Institute, Sydney
Professor and Head , School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales