- Bridin Murnion
- Aust Prescr 2015;38:212-15
- 1 December 2015
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2015.072
A number of therapeutic uses of cannabis and its derivatives have been postulated from preclinical investigations.
Possible clinical indications include spasticity and pain in multiple sclerosis, cancer-associated nausea and vomiting, cancer pain and HIV neuropathy. However, evidence is limited, may reflect subjective rather than objective outcomes, and is not conclusive.
Controversies lie in how to produce, supply and administer cannabinoid products. Introduction of cannabinoids therapeutically should be supported by a regulatory and educational framework that minimises the risk of harm to patients and the community. The Regulator of Medicinal Cannabis Bill 2014 is under consideration in Australia to address this.
Nabiximols is the only cannabinoid on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods at present, although cannabidiol has been recommended for inclusion in Schedule 4.
The intoxicating properties of cannabis have been recognised for millennia. The major psychoactive constituent of cannabis is △-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The non-psychoactive cannabidiol is another major component. Characterisation of these and other derivatives, as well as the receptors they interact with, has increased our understanding of the endocannabinoid system.1
Evidence from animal studies has supported a role for cannabis derivatives and endocannabinoids in acute, visceral and cancer pain, neuro-inflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders, appetite and weight gain, cancer, seizure disorder and inflammatory bowel disease.2 This has led to clinical studies of cannabis.
It is imperative that debate around medicinal cannabis use is not confused with legalisation of recreational marijuana.
There is no agreed definition of medicinal cannabis. The term is used to refer to the therapeutic use of herbal cannabis and its constituents. Nabiximols is the only medicinal cannabis included on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG). It is a combination of cannabidiol and THC in a spray, indicated for muscle relaxation for spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Nabiximols is a Schedule 8 drug. Cannabidiol has been recommended for inclusion in Schedule 4.3
Nabiximols is also available overseas along with other cannabis products including:4
In the Netherlands, the Office for Medicinal Cannabis oversees production of pharmaceutical grade herbal cannabis. Different strains of cannabis are cultivated under stringent conditions with strict quality control to produce herbal cannabis with variable but defined amounts of THC and cannabidiol.5,6 This is distributed through pharmacies and is supported by patient information.5
The most studied cannabinoids are THC and cannabidiol. THC is the major psychoactive constituent of cannabis and acts as a partial agonist at CB1 and CB2 receptors.7 Cannabidiol is not psychoactive and is an antagonist at CB1 and CB2.8 It acts at multiple other receptors and can be an agonist in some systems.
Cannabidiol reduces the psychoactive effect of THC, improving its tolerability and, perhaps also, its safety by reducing the likelihood of adverse psychiatric effects. Cannabis also contains other less well characterised phytocannabinoids. Metabolites of parent compounds may also have activity.7,9
The endocannabinoid system is complex and has numerous physiological roles including immunomodulation, neuroplasticity, learning, emotional modulation, motivation, appetite, vascular function and gut motility.10
The cannabinoid receptors – CB1 and CB2 – are predominantly inhibitory.9,10 CB1 is mainly located in the central and peripheral nervous systems, altering neurotransmitter release, and CB2 on immune cells, modifying cytokine release.
A role for cannabinoid receptor modulation has been suggested in a number of diseases.2,7 In animal studies, CB1 receptor activation reduced nausea and vomiting, and increased feeding. It also reduced seizures and nociception in visceral pain. Reduction of intraocular pressure has also been demonstrated. Activation of the CB1 receptor may enhance survival in haemorrhagic and cardiogenic shock.
Animal studies have also shown that activation of CB1 and CB2 receptors may reduce the clinical manifestations of multiple sclerosis, neuropathic and inflammatory pain, and reduce tumour cell growth and angiogenesis in some cancers. CB2 receptor activation reduces inflammation and progression of atherosclerosis, and increases apoptosis.2
Cannabis has been trialled for various indications.
The American Academy of Neurology has developed a consensus statement on the use of cannabinoids for multiple sclerosis. Evidence supports oral cannabis extract, THC and nabiximols for subjective, but not objective, improvements in spasticity. Oral cannabis extract reduces central pain in multiple sclerosis, while THC and nabiximols are probably effective. The efficacy of smoked cannabis in either spasticity or central pain is unclear.11
A modest benefit of dronabinol has been shown in HIV-associated weight loss. However, robust data in patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy are not available.12 In HIV neuropathy, smoked cannabis reduces pain, including experimentally induced pain, when assessed by changes in visual analogue scores.13
While cannabis and derivatives show some efficacy in pain associated with multiple sclerosis, cancer and HIV, evidence in other painful conditions is inconclusive. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, there may be a minor effect on pain.13 Evidence for efficacy of cannabinoids in fibromyalgia is limited.13
Overall, medicinal cannabis is not recommended in chronic non-cancer pain. Indeed its psychoactive effects may cause poor engagement in multimodal, non-pharmacological pain management.14
The US National Cancer Institute reports evidence for the use of nabiximols, nabilone and cannabis in cancer-related pain.15 Cancer Council Australia’s position statement similarly acknowledges some benefit in pain, appetite stimulation and nausea.16 Nabilone and dronabinol are approved in Europe and the USA for cancer-related vomiting. There is not adequate evidence for inhaled cannabis in this indication.15
There are mixed data in animal models of epilepsy. THC has been shown to be both pro- and anticonvulsant. Cannabidiol appears more promising, with some limited experience in humans.17 Preliminary data from a trial of cannabidiol (Epidiolex) found benefit in treatment-resistant paediatric epilepsy.18 This has led to much community debate, and to parents accessing cannabinoids illegally for treatment of children with catastrophic epilepsy syndromes.19
Recent data show that nabiximols reduces symptoms during cannabis withdrawal, but does not impact on long-term outcomes.20
The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of cannabidiol have led to investigation of cannabinoids in neurodegenerative disorders including Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and neonatal hypoxia-ischaemia. No definitive role has been identified.8
The psychoactive effects of cannabis include anxiety, dysphoria, euphoria, hallucinations, paranoia, acute memory impairment and reduced cognitive performance. Acute cannabis use is also associated with increased motor vehicle accidents.22
Increased airway diseases and oropharyngeal cancers may be risks of smoking cannabis. Other chronic toxicities include dependence, increased risk of schizophrenia and, probably, cognitive impairment.22
In clinical trials, discontinuations because of adverse effects were predominantly in response to psychiatric events. These were associated with higher doses of THC,11 and were less common at higher doses of cannabidiol.5 Notably, in a number of American states where medical cannabis laws have been enacted, there is a reduction in overdose deaths from opioids.23
There are many challenges in considering medicinal cannabis.24 Evidence supports the use of medicinal cannabis in a small number of conditions, but there is significant community pressure for use beyond these conditions.
The complexity of endocannabinoid signalling and the multiple receptor targets of cannabinoids present challenges when developing compounds with predictable efficacy and toxicity.8,25 Ideally, medicines are provided as refined molecules with defined pharmacology, accurate dosing, minimal adverse effects and optimal efficacy. However, it may be that therapeutic benefits are effected by the mixture of compounds in herbal cannabis, rather than by the isolated cannabinoid.
Diversion of medicinal cannabis is of concern, as is early initiation of use in adolescents. There is also the risk of accidental childhood overdose.24
As in all therapeutic decisions, the principles of the quality use of medicines should be followed. These include considering if a medicine is needed and, if so, choosing one that is safe and effective in the correct formulation and dose.28
A harm–benefit assessment is critical in decision making. In terminal disease or intractable epilepsy, using products or delivery routes that might otherwise be unacceptable may be supported.
Legislation around medicinal cannabis is complex and evolving. Products listed on the ARTG are governed by the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.29 The Narcotic Drugs Act 1967 regulates narcotic cultivation and production.30 The Regulator of Medicinal Cannabis Bill 2014 is currently under consideration by the Australian Government.31 This bill, if enacted, would provide a system for regulating cannabis independent of the Therapeutic Goods Administration, and a system for cannabis cultivation and production parallel to the Narcotic Drugs Act.31 Development of such a regulatory system will likely be costly.
If medicinal cannabis is to be introduced, it should be supported with prescriber and consumer education, prescriber peer review, a robust authority process and pharmacovigilance for adverse events. Hopefully we can prevent the emergence of the problems seen with prescription opioids and benzodiazepines. The regulatory framework must be responsive to changes in evidenced-based practice.
There is some evidence of therapeutic benefit for cannabis products in defined patient populations. While waiting for a regulatory framework, more defined products, and more definitive data to become available, a major question is whether herbal cannabis should be introduced, with appropriate legislation to prevent criminalisation, for strictly defined populations and diseases. Monitoring for individual and community safety should be a component of any model.
* An inverse agonist binds to a receptor but has the opposite effect of an agonist.
Conflict of interest: none declared
Senior staff specialist, Drug Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney
Clinical senior lecturer, Addiction Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney