Letters to the Editor
- Gordon Hartenstein, John E. Murtagh
- Aust Prescr 1995;18:4-7
- 1 January 1995
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.1995.006
The Editorial Executive Committee welcomes letters, which should be less than 250 words. Before a decision to publish is made, letters which refer to a published article may be sent to the author for a response. Any letter may be sent to an expert for comment. When letters are published, they are usually accompanied in the same issue by their responses or comments. The Committee screens out discourteous, inaccurate or libellous statements. The letters are sub-edited before publication. Authors are required to declare any conflicts of interest. The Committee's decision on publication is final.
Editor, In Professor Murtagh's article (Aust Prescr 1994;17:33-6), he says' It is incumbent on the practitioner to provide competent care from the onset with appropriate referrals where necessary so that the patient remains in mainstream medicine and is not tempted to gravitate to alternate practitioners who may confuse management'.
May I ask two questions. Does the training of medical practitioners equip them to provide 'competent care' in this area? Why shouldn't there be interdisciplinary consultation with chiropractors to eliminate confusion of management?
In exactly 50 years I have seen cooperation between doctor and dentist change from virtually nil to full consultation and courteous referral. Surely everyone in their own field should be free to consult and cooperate with others throughout the medical world.
Dental Surgeon (retired)
Beverly Hills, N.S.W.
Professor J.E. Murtagh, the author of the article, comments:
Although there is obviously considerable variation in standards within the medical profession, I would expect that most general practitioners are able to provide competent care in the management of back problems. The modern general practitioner is much better educated in this area and several hundred have attended courses on 'Back pain and spinal manipulation' conducted by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, the Australian Association of Musculoskeletal Medicine and the Australian College of Physical Medicine. Many are skilled at providing complete care for back problems including use of physical therapies such as spinal mobilisation and manipulation.
If the practitioners lack the skill of physical therapy and other areas of management, they should refer wherever appropriate. However, I am recommending that they should stay in control of management and avoid the situation where patients move completely out of medical management and drift around among alternate practitioners.
This strategy means that general practitioners may cross refer to medical specialists, physiotherapists, osteopaths or chiropractors or any practitioner known to the patient's doctor as a competent caring artisan who is prepared to 'share care'. After all, a successful cost effective outcome to the patient's problem is the primary concern of the general practitioner.
Dental Surgeon (retired), Beverly Hills, N.S.W.
Professor of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne