Letters to the Editor
Patient medication list
- Michael Patkin, Hugh Dearnley, Chris Thompson
- Aust Prescr 1994;17:79-81
- 1 October 1994
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.1994.077
The Editorial Executive Committee welcomes letters, which should be less than 250 words. Before a decision to publish is made, letters which refer to a published article may be sent to the author for a response. Any letter may be sent to an expert for comment. When letters are published, they are usually accompanied in the same issue by their responses or comments. The Committee screens out discourteous, inaccurate or libellous statements. The letters are sub-edited before publication. Authors are required to declare any conflicts of interest. The Committee's decision on publication is final.
Editor, – Dr Bradley ('Your questions to the PBAC' Aust Prescr 1993;16:96) observes that it is easy to lose touch with a patient's medications because 'a complete list (is not available) ... all at one time.'
There are several ways in which patients could have such a list, with its obvious advantages. One is by using the 'Medi-List' issued by the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia and illustrated in 'Medication review: what your patients may not tell you' (Aust Prescr 1993;I6:40-2).This card has spaces for information about the individual and the medications, and folds down to a convenient pocket size similar to the pension card. Its main drawbacks are:
The 'Medi-List' has been used at Whyalla Hospital for some months and, after about 80 cards had been issued, an alternative method was investigated. A detailed printout of patients' medications is prepared on computer in a form similar (but not identical) to the 'Medi-List'. It is provided to selected patients on discharge, mainly those on multiple long-term treatments.
The printout is designed to be understood easily by patients and their carers, with extra attention to legibility for those with mild visual impairment. It saves handwriting and is very quick to update if any changes have been made to medication. So far, about 20 patients have been supplied, and the initial response has been favourable.
Such a small scheme may not provide all the answers to Dr Bradley's problems, but, so far, it appears to assist with many of the difficulties which patients have with compliance, and to help others involved in their care. In the next part of this project, it is planned to study in more detail how patients and others use this printout, the costs or savings that result and any consequences that may emerge.
Michael Patkin, Visiting Surgeon
Hugh Dearnley, Visiting Medical Officer
Chris Thompson, Pharmacist
Whyalla Hospital & Health Services, S.A.
Visiting Surgeon, Whyalla Hospital & Health Services, S.A.
Visiting Medical Officer, Whyalla Hospital & Health Services, S.A.
Pharmacist, Whyalla Hospital & Health Services, S.A.