Letters to the Editor
Prescribing costs and budgets
- Aust Prescr 1997;20:83-6
- 1 October 1997
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.1997.079
The Editorial Executive Committee welcomes letters, which should be less than 250 words. Before a decision to publish is made, letters which refer to a published article may be sent to the author for a response. Any letter may be sent to an expert for comment. When letters are published, they are usually accompanied in the same issue by their responses or comments. The Committee screens out discourteous, inaccurate or libellous statements. The letters are sub-edited before publication. Authors are required to declare any conflicts of interest. The Committee's decision on publication is final.
Editor, – The editorial 'Prescribing budgets: economic, clinical and ethical perspectives' (Aust Prescr 1997;20:28-9) by S.B. Soumerai and D. Ross-Degnan recommended that 'we need to know how to educate physicians'. As a first year medical student, may I suggest you target medical students and their educators.
As well as using drug names, brand names have been used in our problem-based learning cases, with brand names also being used in some lectures. This seems pointless in a teaching environment, especially as we will initially be employed in hospitals which generally do not allow prescribing of brands.
Student concerns about the appropriateness of learning brand names at this stage have been ignored and I feel we have no influence in these matters. To give you an example of the extent of this problem, at our Medical Ball, a staff member gave a short speech during which it was suggested that we support brand names because they sponsor events like the Medical Ball!
Graduate medical student
University of Queensland