Key points

  • Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin analogue that can be used in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Insulin glargine has similar efficacy to that of isophane insulin in controlling blood glucose.
  • Insulin glargine can reduce the overall incidence of hypoglycaemia, mostly at night, compared with isophane insulin. The risk of severe hypoglycaemia is similar to that with isophane insulin.
  • Inform patients that insulin glargine is a clear, not a cloudy, solution. It should not be confused with clear short- or rapid-acting insulins.
  • Insulin glargine can be given once daily, which may be more convenient for patients or carers who need to inject intermediate-acting insulin more than once daily.
  • If switching from twice-daily isophane insulin to insulin glargine, use an initial dose that is 20% less than the total previous dose of isophane insulin, and titrate upwards if needed.

 

PBS listing

Insulin glargine is listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) as an unrestricted benefit. Insulin glargine can be prescribed on the PBS for adults and children with type 1 diabetes mellitus and adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who require insulin.

 

Reason for PBS listing

Insulin glargine was listed on a cost-effectiveness basis compared with isophane insulin.1 The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee accepted that the improvement in hypoglycaemic event rates with insulin glargine, albeit in a population which cannot be defined, was cost effective at the price proposed.1,2

 

Place in therapy

Insulin glargine was generally as well tolerated as isophane insulin in studies. As with other insulins, adverse effects include hypoglycaemia, injection-site reactions, weight gain, headache, diarrhoea and infections.3,8–10,12–17,21–24 Insulin glargine may cause more pain at the injection site than isophane insulin (up to 6% and 1% of patients, respectively).3,4,9,13,21 Injection-site reactions were generally mild and did not result in cessation of treatment.

Report suspected adverse reactions to the Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (ADRAC) online or by using the 'Blue Card' distributed with Australian Prescriber. For information about reporting adverse reactions, see the Therapeutic Goods Administration website.

Insulin glargine reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of hypoglycaemia

As can be seen in Table 1, hypoglycaemia:

  • remains a risk with insulin glargine
  • is more common in type 1 than type 2 diabetes
  • is slightly less frequent with insulin glargine compared with isophane insulin
  • occurs at a similar rate between these insulins for severe events.

Table 1.
Proportion of patients with at least one hypoglycaemic event in studies of insulin glargine compared with isophane insulin8–18,21–23

Hypoglycaemic event* Insulin glargine Isophane insulin
Type 1 diabetes
All symptomatic events 40–100% 49–98%
  • Nocturnal events
18–81% 27–86%
  • Severe events
0–11% 0–15%
Type 2 diabetes
All symptomatic events 22–61% 32-67%
  • Nocturnal events
7–31% 19–40%
  • Severe events
0–7% 0–10%

* Definitions of hypoglycaemic events varied between studies: symptomatic (clinical symptoms confirmed or unconfirmed by FBG < 2.0–4.2 mmol/L), nocturnal (symptomatic hypoglycaemia occurring during sleep between bedtime and getting up in the morning, i.e. before morning pre-breakfast FBG measurement and morning insulin injection), severe (symptomatic hypoglycaemia requiring assistance from another person, with either FBG < 2.0–3.1 mmol/L or prompt recovery after administration of oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose or glucagon).


Insulin glargine mainly reduces the incidence of hypoglycaemia at night.9,15–19 Studies of up to 1 year found that insulin glargine reduced the proportion of patients with at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycaemia by 5–20% compared with isophane insulin.8–15 In patients with type 1 diabetes, absolute rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia were reported as 1–2 episodes per month with insulin glargine and 3–4 episodes per month with isophane insulin.18,19 The absolute rates for patients with type 2 diabetes were 4–5 episodes per year with insulin glargine and 7–8 episodes per year with isophane insulin.16,17

Lower incidence of hypoglycaemia is more apparent with insulin glargine compared with once-daily isophane insulin

The incidence of hypoglycaemia appears lowest when insulin glargine is compared with isophane insulin once daily10,20,23,24; this is likely due to once-daily doses being higher than individual doses of isophane insulin twice daily. In one 4-week study of type 1 diabetes10, the proportion of patients with at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was 36% with insulin glargine, 44% with isophane insulin twice daily, and 66% with isophane insulin once daily. In a 28-week study of type 2 diabetes13,24, there was less symptomatic hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine but only when compared with the subgroup of patients given isophane insulin once daily (46% versus 60%, respectively).

 

Safety issues

Insulin glargine was generally as well tolerated as isophane insulin in studies. As with other insulins, adverse effects include hypoglycaemia, injection-site reactions, weight gain, headache, diarrhoea and infections.3,8–10,12–17,21–24 Insulin glargine may cause more pain at the injection site than isophane insulin (up to 6% and 1% of patients, respectively).3,4,9,13,21 Injection-site reactions were generally mild and did not result in cessation of treatment.

Report suspected adverse reactions to the Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (ADRAC) online or by using the 'Blue Card' distributed with Australian Prescriber. For information about reporting adverse reactions, see the Therapeutic Goods Administration website.

Insulin glargine reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of hypoglycaemia

As can be seen in Table 1, hypoglycaemia:

  • remains a risk with insulin glargine
  • is more common in type 1 than type 2 diabetes
  • is slightly less frequent with insulin glargine compared with isophane insulin
  • occurs at a similar rate between these insulins for severe events.

Table 1.
Proportion of patients with at least one hypoglycaemic event in studies of insulin glargine compared with isophane insulin8–18,21–23

Hypoglycaemic event* Insulin glargine Isophane insulin
Type 1 diabetes
All symptomatic events 40–100% 49–98%
  • Nocturnal events
18–81% 27–86%
  • Severe events
0–11% 0–15%
Type 2 diabetes
All symptomatic events 22–61% 32-67%
  • Nocturnal events
7–31% 19–40%
  • Severe events
0–7% 0–10%

* Definitions of hypoglycaemic events varied between studies: symptomatic (clinical symptoms confirmed or unconfirmed by FBG < 2.0–4.2 mmol/L), nocturnal (symptomatic hypoglycaemia occurring during sleep between bedtime and getting up in the morning, i.e. before morning pre-breakfast FBG measurement and morning insulin injection), severe (symptomatic hypoglycaemia requiring assistance from another person, with either FBG < 2.0–3.1 mmol/L or prompt recovery after administration of oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose or glucagon).


Insulin glargine mainly reduces the incidence of hypoglycaemia at night.9,15–19 Studies of up to 1 year found that insulin glargine reduced the proportion of patients with at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycaemia by 5–20% compared with isophane insulin.8–15 In patients with type 1 diabetes, absolute rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia were reported as 1–2 episodes per month with insulin glargine and 3–4 episodes per month with isophane insulin.18,19 The absolute rates for patients with type 2 diabetes were 4–5 episodes per year with insulin glargine and 7–8 episodes per year with isophane insulin.16,17

Lower incidence of hypoglycaemia is more apparent with insulin glargine compared with once-daily isophane insulin

The incidence of hypoglycaemia appears lowest when insulin glargine is compared with isophane insulin once daily10,20,23,24; this is likely due to once-daily doses being higher than individual doses of isophane insulin twice daily. In one 4-week study of type 1 diabetes10, the proportion of patients with at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was 36% with insulin glargine, 44% with isophane insulin twice daily, and 66% with isophane insulin once daily. In a 28-week study of type 2 diabetes13,24, there was less symptomatic hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine but only when compared with the subgroup of patients given isophane insulin once daily (46% versus 60%, respectively).

 

Dosing issues

Insulin glargine is usually injected subcutaneously once daily at bedtime.3 The initial dose and time of administration is determined on an individual basis and adjusted according to blood glucose levels.3

Switching from other insulins to insulin glargine

When changing treatment from another intermediate- or long-acting insulin to insulin glargine, the dose of rapid- or short-acting insulin, or oral hypoglycaemic agents, may need adjustment.3

Patients who previously used once-daily isophane insulin can generally be switched to insulin glargine using the same dose. However, some patients who used twice-daily isophane insulin reported increased hypoglycaemia during dose titration with insulin glargine.21–23 If switching such patients to insulin glargine, use an initial dose that is 20% less than the total previous dose of twice-daily isophane insulin, and titrate upwards if needed.3

 

Information for patients

Inform patients and/or carers that insulin glargine:

  • is a long-acting insulin for lowering blood glucose levels between meals
  • is a clear solution — not to be confused with rapid- and short-acting insulins, which are also clear solutions
  • is usually given as a once-daily injection
  • must not be mixed with any other insulin or be diluted
  • can lower the risk of, but not prevent, episodes of hypoglycaemia
  • has a prolonged effect, which may delay recovery from hypoglycaemia.3

Advise about the factors that increase the risk of hypoglycaemia with insulins, including:

  • inappropriate use of high doses
  • missing or delaying meals
  • insufficient carbohydrate intake
  • drinking alcohol
  • unaccustomed or unplanned exercise.4,6

Suggest or provide the Lantus Consumer Medicine Information (CMI) leaflet.

 

References

  1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. March 2006 Extraordinary Meeting PBAC Outcomes: positive recommendations. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2006. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/pbacrec-mar06-extra (accessed 4 September 2006).
  2. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Public Summary Document. Insulin glargine, injection, 100 units per mL, Lantus, March 2006. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2006. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/wcms/publishing.nsf/Content/pbac-psd-insulinglargine-mar06 (accessed 24 August 2006).
  3. Aventis Pharma Pty Limited. Lantus product information. 5\u00a0October\u00a02005.
  4. Australian Medicines Handbook. Adelaide: Australian Medicines Handbook Pty Limited, 2006.
  5. Hirsch I. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med 2005;352:174\u201383. [PubMed]
  6. Endocrinology Expert Group. Therapeutic Guidelines: Endocrinology, Version\u00a03. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited, 2004.
  7. Diabetes Australia and The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Diabetes Management in General Practice. Canberra: Diabetes Australia, 2006/7.
  8. Fulcher GR, Gilbert RE, Yue DK. Glargine is superior to neutral protamine Hagedorn for improving glycated haemoglobin and fasting blood glucose levels during intensive insulin therapy. Intern Med J 2005;35:536\u201342. [PubMed]
  9. Ratner RE, Hirsch IB, Neifing JL, et al. Less hypoglycemia with insulin glargine in intensive insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes. U.S. Study Group of Insulin Glargine in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:639\u201343. [PubMed]
  10. Pieber TR, Eugene-Jolchine I, Derobert E. Efficacy and safety of HOE 901 versus NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. The European Study Group of HOE 901 in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:157\u201362. [PubMed]
  11. Rosenstock J, Dailey G, Massi-Benedetti M, et al. Reduced hypoglycemia risk with insulin glargine: a meta-analysis comparing insulin glargine with human NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:950\u20135. [PubMed]
  12. HOESI Group. Safety and efficacy of insulin glargine (HOE 901) versus NPH insulin in combination with oral treatment in Type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2003;20:545\u201351. [PubMed]
  13. Rosenstock J, Schwartz SL, Clark CM Jr, et al. Basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: 28-week comparison of insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH insulin. Diabetes Care 2001;24:631\u20136. [PubMed]
  14. Massi Benedetti M, Humburg E, Ziemen M. A one-year, randomised, multicentre trial comparing insulin glargine with NPH insulin in combination with oral agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. Horm Metab Res 2003;35:189\u201396. [PubMed]
  15. Fritsche A, Schweitzer MA, Haring HU, et al. Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:952\u20139. [PubMed]
  16. Yki-Jarvinen H, Kauppinen-Makelin R, Tiikkainen M, et al. Insulin glargine or NPH combined with metformin in type 2 diabetes: The LANMET study. Diabetologia 2006;49:442\u201351. [PubMed]
  17. Riddle MC, Rosenstock J, Gerich J. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3080\u20136. [PubMed]
  18. Porcellati F, Rossetti P, Pampanelli S, et al. Better long-term glycaemic control with the basal insulin glargine as compared with NPH in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus given meal-time lispro insulin. Diabet Med 2004;21:1213\u201320. [PubMed]
  19. Rossetti P, Pampanelli S, Fanelli C, et al. Intensive replacement of basal insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes given rapid-acting insulin analog at mealtime: a 3-month comparison between administration of NPH insulin four times daily and glargine insulin at dinner or bedtime. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1490\u20136. [PubMed]
  20. Warren E, Weatherley-Jones E, Chilcott J, Beverley C. Systematic review and economic evaluation of a long-acting insulin analogue, insulin glargine. Health Technol Assess 2004;(8). [PubMed]
  21. Raskin P, Klaff L, Bergenstal R, et al. A 16-week comparison of the novel insulin analog insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH human insulin used with insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1666\u201371. [PubMed]
  22. Rosenstock J, Park G, Zimmerman J. Basal insulin glargine (HOE 901) versus NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes on multiple daily insulin regimens. U.S. Insulin Glargine (HOE 901) Type 1 Diabetes Investigator Group. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1137\u201342. [PubMed]
  23. Home PD, Rosskamp R, Forjanic-Klapproth J, Dressler A. A randomized multicentre trial of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2005;21:545\u201353. [PubMed]
  24. Fonseca V, Bell DS, Berger S, et al. A comparison of bedtime insulin glargine with bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: subgroup analysis of patients taking once-daily insulin in a multicenter, randomized, parallel group study. Am J Med Sci 2004;328:274\u201380. [PubMed]