The Editorial Executive Committee welcomes letters, which should be less than 250 words. Before a decision to publish is made, letters which refer to a published article may be sent to the author for a response. Any letter may be sent to an expert for comment. When letters are published, they are usually accompanied in the same issue by their responses or comments. The Committee screens out discourteous, inaccurate or libellous statements. The letters are sub-edited before publication. Authors are required to declare any conflicts of interest. The Committee's decision on publication is final.
Letter to the Editor
Editor, – The article'Prescribing in renal disease' (Aust Prescr 2007;30:17-20)is a useful contribution to the complex issues currently facing prescribers. There is wide agreement that determining kidney function by measurement or assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is preferable to using the serum creatinine alone, for all clinical purposes (including drug dosing).
The vast majority of prescribing in Australian general practice occurs without knowledge of the patient's kidney function. When an assessment of kidney function is available it is now usually in the form of an automatically generated eGFR (estimated GFR) derived from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study. Few, if any, practitioners routinely calculate GFR by using the Cockcroft-Gault equation or measure creatinine clearance on all patients.
After considering these matters, a meeting of the Australian Creatinine Consensus Working Group agreed that the following recommendation should be promoted to Australian prescribers:
Decision making in drug dose adjustment in people with chronic kidney disease is enhanced by an assessment of kidney function based on GFR rather than a serum creatinine concentration alone. In most out-of-hospital settings (particularly general practice) where an eGFR (MDRD) is on hand and no other measure of GFR is known or readily accessible, it is clinically appropriate to use eGFR to assist drug dosing decision making.
However, for critical dose drugs, particularly in a hospital setting, it remains important to adhere to the published recommendations that usually involve the use of the Cockcroft-Gault equation to estimate GFR, or to measure creatinine clearance in order to amend dosing for renal function.
The product information guiding dose adjustment in patients with reduced GFR is often permeated with imprecise and undefined terminology (such as renal impairment, mild/moderate renal insufficiency) and is in need of a major overhaul with an emphasis on the recently introduced staging of chronic kidney disease by GFR reduction. There is also variability in the recommended use of the Cockcroft-Gault equation with regard to use of estimated ideal body weight from height and build, and there has been no update to the formula to account for re-standardisation of creatinine assays.
Automatically generated eGFR using the MDRD formula more closely correlates with true GFR than an estimate based on Cockcroft-Gault (particularly in the key clinical area of GFR reduction between 15 and 60 mL/min/1.73m2) and both are better than a timed clearance. At the very least the eGFR alerts treating doctors to the possibility of reduced renal function prompting the use of other estimates if desired. In the future it is likely that eGFR will be the major basis for adjusting doses for people with reduced GFR. At present it appears reasonable and indeed preferable, in the absence of any other measure of kidney function, to use the eGFR (recognising its limitations) as a guide to prescribing particularly with non-critical dose drugs.
Kidney Health Australia
Department of Biochemistry, St Vincent's Hospital
David Johnson Professor, Director of Nephrology
Princess Alexandra Hospital