Management of postsurgical pain in the community
- Ross MacPherson, Gavin Pattullo
- Aust Prescr 2020;43:191-4
- 1 December 2020
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2020.062
Following surgery there is often a need for ongoing pain management after the patient is discharged from hospital. This can be made easier if the patient has an appropriate discussion before leaving hospital about what pain they can expect, and they are given a management plan.
Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are suitable for most patients. Drugs with a short half-life, such as ibuprofen, may need to be taken regularly.
Short-acting opioids can have a short-term role, providing guidelines are followed. There is a predictable period of time after surgery when the benefit of an opioid is expected to be maximised before harmful adverse effects will dominate.
Gabapentinoids are useful for neuropathic pain, but have a limited role in nociceptive pain. Like opioids, they have a risk of misuse.
The surgeon should be consulted if the patient develops new pain or the postoperative pain becomes more severe.
Most postsurgical pain will resolve within three months. If not, it is deemed persistent pain that may warrant specialist assessment.
After a patient is discharged from hospital the management of postsurgical pain in the community can be challenging. The degree of difficulty this poses depends on the patient’s management before they leave hospital.
On returning home, it is important the patient has realistic expectations of what to expect regarding their pain. This can be facilitated by an appropriate discussion with the surgical or pain management team before discharge. Preferably, the patient is given a written pain management plan that can be followed after leaving hospital, with realistic goals as to when they can return to physical activity or work. Communicating these plans with the patient’s local doctor is critical. Patients who still have moderate pain who are discharged with long-acting opioids, without a plan, or any expectation of what to expect in terms of ongoing management, are at a significant disadvantage.
On discharge from hospital the quantity of analgesic drugs should be limited to the equivalent of 2–3 days supply. This encourages the judicious use of the drugs and ensures early contact with their GP to obtain any continuing supply.
There have been many well-conducted studies on the incidence of postsurgical pain following discharge from hospital. One major review found the incidence of persistent pain was 13.6% four months after hernia repair, 11.8% after vaginal hysterectomy and 25.1% after abdominal hysterectomy. At one year these figures had fallen to 6.2%, 4.1% and 9.9%.1
Box 1 - Surgical procedures associated with a high incidence of persistent postoperative pain2
Coronary artery bypass Thoracotomy
Breast surgery Inguinal hernia repair
Lower segment caesarean section
Box 2 - Patient factors associated with an increased incidence of postoperative pain3
Young age Female
History of depression or anxiety Sleep disturbance
Increased body-mass index Smoking
Preoperative pain Preoperative analgesic use
While some ongoing pain is to be expected after surgery, clinicians should be alert for the appearance of new pain, or pain with increasing severity. This may herald a ‘red flag’ that might be associated with a complication from the procedure and necessitates referral back to the surgeon. Importantly, ask if the pain has been severe enough to prevent sleep or impede return to some degree of function.
It is important not to miss the emergence of neuropathic pain, which usually responds poorly to conventional analgesics. Pain that occurs within a circumscribed nerve distribution, exhibits hyperalgesia or allodynia, or is described as ‘shooting’ or like an ‘electric shock’ by the patient should arouse suspicion. This is particularly common following certain types of surgery, such as mastectomy or thoracotomy. Neuropathic pain requires a different approach to treatment, so it is crucial that it is detected at an early stage.
Analgesics are a key component of postsurgical pain management. Using a multimodal approach to analgesia can both maximise the response to medicines and limit the use of opioids.
The prescriber must remember that, with the exception of paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), all of the commonly used analgesics can have significant depressant effects on the central nervous system. While tolerance no doubt develops, drowsiness and effects on higher-centre functions may impede the patient’s capacity to drive or to return to work.
Paracetamol is a useful starting point for any analgesic plan. If the pain is persistent, the patient should be encouraged to take paracetamol regularly rather than as needed.
For uncomplicated nociceptive pain, NSAIDs are now first line unless contraindicated. Relative contraindications include previous gastrointestinal adverse events, kidney disease, history of cardiovascular disease, older age, and an increased risk of bleeding. The risk of adverse effects needs to be carefully monitored, especially because their incidence appears to be correlated with increases in the dose and duration of treatment.
Although these drugs can be purchased over-the-counter, they are effective analgesics – a fact that often needs to be reinforced with patients. NSAIDs are particularly useful for pain precipitated by movement.4 While there may be some reticence by surgeons to prescribe these drugs in the very early postoperative period, because of concern about an increased risk of bleeding, this should not be a reason to withhold NSAIDs by the time the patient is rehabilitating.
There seems to be little to differentiate these drugs in terms of efficacy apart from their COX-2 selectivity and pharmacokinetics. Drugs with short half-lives such as ibuprofen or diclofenac need to be taken regularly throughout the day which is a possible disadvantage compared to drugs with long half-lives such as meloxicam. However, drugs with short half-lives have a more rapid onset of action and, should any adverse effects occur, can be quickly discontinued.
COX-2-specific drugs provide a similar level of analgesia, but the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects may be lower. While it is a long-held belief that NSAIDs need to be taken with food, recent studies have shown that this does not reduce the rate of gastrointestinal adverse effects. Indeed, taking them on an empty stomach results in higher blood concentrations and improved analgesia.
Opioids should have a limited role once the patient is discharged from hospital. If they are used in initial pain management, only immediate-acting products should be prescribed, unless the patient was taking sustained-release drugs before admission for surgery.5
The opioid crisis has reinforced the need for more considered prescribing of pure opioid agonists with a clear understanding for both the doctor and the patient of what role the drugs play. While opioids relieve pain they should not be seen as first-line analgesics. They are best viewed as rescue medicines. There are some general considerations that should apply:
With regard to the choice of drug, pure opioid agonists have largely replaced the use of the prodrug codeine. Codeine has an unpredictable effect owing to genetically determined variations in metabolism, and when used alone has negligible analgesic properties.
In adults, determining the opioid dose is based more on the age of the patient and presence of debilitating comorbidities, rather than body weight as is often used. Indeed, at the upper extreme of size, owing to the likelihood of obstructive sleep apnoea, weight-based dosing should not be used.
Tapentadol, which is available in immediate-release and sustained-release formulations, is appropriately classified as an opioid, but has a dual mechanism of action which also involves noradrenergic pathways. It has a relatively weak opioid effect and this is reflected in its lower incidence of morphine-like adverse effects.
Tramadol can be useful in the early management of postoperative pain. It acts via opioid receptor stimulation and augmentation of noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and serotonin pathways. Some studies have suggested tramadol may be beneficial in neuropathic pain states. However, the response to tramadol can be mixed, most likely as a result of the complex pharmacokinetic polymorphism associated with its metabolism.8 This probably explains its failure to elicit a useful response in a subgroup of patients.
While research suggests that pregabalin and gabapentin are useful for neuropathic pain states, reports of their efficacy in postsurgical pain have been mixed.9,10 Furthermore, there are significant risks associated with long-term prescribing:
Most pain should resolve within three months. The emergence of red flags after discharge requires prompt consultation with the surgeon.
The International Association for the Study of Pain has defined chronic postsurgical pain as a condition that exists when the pain:
When pain persists for more than three months after discharge, or the patient has been unable to return to an expected level of functioning, further assessment either by the treating surgeon or a specialist pain clinic is warranted.
Postsurgical pain is common and a degree of pain can be expected after the patient leaves hospital. Most pain can be managed in the first instance by non- opioid drugs.
It is clearly in the patient’s best interest if their ongoing management can be overseen by a single prescriber, who can assess ongoing analgesic requirements and make referrals when appropriate. Good communication between the hospital and primary care is essential.
Ross MacPherson has received payments for educational sessions from Seqirus. Gavin Pattullo has received payments for presentations made from Seqirus and Astra Zeneca.
Clinical Professor, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney
Director, Acute Pain Service, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney