The Editorial Executive Committee welcomes letters, which should be less than 250 words. Before a decision to publish is made, letters which refer to a published article may be sent to the author for a response. Any letter may be sent to an expert for comment. When letters are published, they are usually accompanied in the same issue by their responses or comments. The Committee screens out discourteous, inaccurate or libellous statements. The letters are sub-edited before publication. Authors are required to declare any conflicts of interest. The Committee's decision on publication is final.
Letter to the editor
Editor, Dr H. Newman ('Letters' Aust Prescr 1995;18:57) states that for many years he has stressed to his trainees that 16 gauge or larger intravenous cannulae need not be used for resuscitation because the flow of a watery solution through an 18 gauge is 'only a little slower'.
It would seem that his trainees, with their intimate knowledge of Poiseuille's law (laminar flow rate alpha radius4), have been too polite to point out that a 16 gauge cannula (ID 1.30 mm 'Surflo') can in fact achieve a flow rate 3.5 times greater than that of an 18 gauge (ID 0.95 mm). Dr Newman's ability to compensate by raising the flask appears to defy Galileo's theory (velocity alpha square root height).
I suggest we observe the resuscitation protocol endorsed by the 5 learned Colleges, for the physics as well as the therapeutics!