Safe prescribing of opioids for persistent non-cancer pain
- Michael McDonough
- Aust Prescr 2012;35:20-4
- 1 February 2012
- DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2012.008
A judicious approach in considering opioid therapy and choosing an appropriate opioid is needed.
After an initial opioid trial, therapy should only be continued when there is reasonable evidence that it is effective and safe.
The evidence for harm associated with long-term opioid prescribing is mounting while there is little evidence to support long-term efficacy. In many cases, reducing and eventually stopping opioid therapy may be the best course of action.
Commitment by both the prescriber and the patient to a treatment plan which includes regular reviews is essential if opioid therapy is prolonged.
The prevalence of opioid prescribing in Australia, particularly for persistent non-malignant pain, has been steadily increasing.1 There is emerging evidence of a corresponding increase in deaths where opioids were detected.2 Similar trends have been reported in the USA with an alarming escalation in opioid-related deaths.3 Safe opioid prescribing is best defined by the principles for the quality use of medicines in Australia's National Medicines Policy.4 This recommends that any reason to prescribe needs to be considered judiciously,5 then appraised for appropriateness, and thereafter monitored for safety and efficacy.
To prescribe opioids beyond eight weeks, most states and territories require the prescriber to have a state permit. However in NSW, a permit is only needed for prescribing opioids to patients with drug dependence. All other jurisdictions need to be notified for any patient who is drug dependent.
There is little evidence for the efficacy of long-term opioid use in persistent non-malignant pain and in trials (up to three months) many patients experienced adverse drug effects.6 However, there is expert consensus that opioid analgesics be considered when other treatments have been inadequate.
Before undertaking a longer-term period of opioid treatment, the patient should be assessed following an initial trial period, for example a month (see Box). After that, the prescriber should identify evidence of improved patient function correlated with opioid use. It is imperative that the patient give informed consent at the start of the trial, acknowledging the possibility of a negative outcome and withdrawal of therapy.
The definition of pain7 as 'an unpleasant sensory and emotional state' reminds us that a significant proportion of a patient's suffering will be related to the emotional contribution to their pain perception. Some patients may report that all treatments have failed including physical and psychological therapy, however this may represent the patient's resistance to engage in appropriate treatment and not necessarily a 'failure of all therapies'. Indeed, physical and psychological interventions may vary in their effect and appropriateness for individual patients, just as drug therapies do.
Chronic pain and depression often coexist and depression may be a reason why some patients respond poorly to initial treatments. If a patient is not responding to opioids, other pain management strategies may need to be considered including referral for an assessment at a specialist pain clinic.
Previous or current substance use disorder increases the risk for addiction and related problems. Screening tools may help to identify this.8 Inadequate compliance with previous therapy, extreme frustration with pain symptoms, inappropriate pursuit of a 'cure', requests based on the second-hand experience of other patients and the patient who predominantly conceptualises pain management as taking medication (chemical coping) would all be reasons for increased caution. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians Prescription Opioid Policy (2009) is freely available to download from www.racp.edu.au.9 It provides an excellent review and guidelines for managing chronic non-malignant pain.
There are numerous contraindications to opioid use. The risk of developing opioid dependence during long-term opioid analgesic prescribing in some patients is significantly increased, for example in those with a history of substance use disorder. To avoid iatrogenic dependence, consult with a pain or addiction medicine specialist when a patient develops 'tolerance' and is seeking a dose increase, particularly when any problematic opioid-related behaviours appear.
Other factors that need to be considered when assessing the patient include the following:
An appropriate opioid best avoids the risk of drug interactions, disease interactions and patient 'interactions' (for example patients may favour 'tamper-resistant' options if children are at home).
Oral long-acting opioids are recommended because short-acting opioids wear off quickly (particularly given tolerance over time), require frequent repeat dosing and, if used chronically, may cause 'analgesic rebound' or break-through pain. Long-acting transdermal and sublingual opioid formulations might be considered for patients who have problems with swallowing tablets.
Patients with drug dependence strongly prefer short-acting drugs with faster onset of action and with higher peak blood levels (that is, quick reward). They will often state a preference for immediate-release preparations or resist taking long-acting drugs.
The chronic use of injectable drugs is inappropriate for persistent pain because recurrent injections lead to tissue injury (which reduces drug absorption), carry the risk of infection as a consequence of chronic injecting and have a greater risk for addiction and diversion*. People who are drug dependent typically manifest a very strong preference for their drug of choice and such patients can be remarkably convincing in their efforts to persuade a compassionate doctor that such therapy is the only effective treatment. Pethidine is now generally viewed as a poor opioid analgesic in comparison with most others now available and is inappropriate for persistent pain.10
Patient reports of 'drug allergy' might instead be dose-related adverse effects like nausea or pruritis and therefore dose reduction is suggested rather than avoidance, or referral to clinical immunology for specific drug sensitivity testing. Sometimes the latter may be necessary if options are restricted by the patient reporting 'allergy' to multiple opioids particularly if there is strong patient preference for treatment with a specific drug, for example pethidine.
After a successful initial therapeutic trial, continuing opioid treatment requires commitment to a treatment plan of regular reviews of efficacy and safety. A common problem faced by some doctors who have been formally investigated for their opioid prescribing has been an apparent deficient or absent opioid treatment plan. Just as treating hypertension requires periodic measurements of blood pressure, continuing opioid therapy requires documentation of ongoing monitoring of patient function. A pain management form11 for patients can be used as a written management plan. Sustained improvement that can be correlated with opioid therapy, without unacceptable adverse effects, constitutes reasonable justification to continue therapy. Correlating opioid therapy with functional improvement is more important than reduction of patient-perceived pain. Relying on a patient's own opinion of their improvement is subjective. Better evidence includes examination of the patient's functioning during regular clinic attendance, reports from their pharmacist and family together with the patient's self-report and use of validated questionnaires such as the Brief Pain Inventory.12
If prescribing beyond 12 months, a second opinion from a specialist (for example in pain medicine) is required to fulfil Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme Authority indications.
It is also important to assess the patient's adherence to treatment by reports from reliable informants. Occasional urine drug screening may be useful. If a patient reports benefit from an opioid and yet one or more urine drug screens show it is not present, diversion should be suspected. There is evidence that even some cancer patients taking opioids have diverted these drugs.13 The practice of medication swapping, borrowing and sharing also needs to be considered as these are not uncommon behaviours.14 Collaboration with the patient's community pharmacist is also a helpful way of improving adherence.
Opioids are not just analgesics, they have a range of effects including endocrine, immunological, cognitive and emotive. Long-term opioid use is associated with numerous adverse reactions (listed in Table 1).15 The continuing management plan needs to incorporate a process of regular review for the risk and occurrence of adverse drug events. This includes monitoring the patient physically, mentally and in regard to areas of important functioning, for example the ability to drive, work, participate in hobbies, and for possible aberrant drug-related behaviours. 8
Opioid dosages over 120 mg (mg morphine equivalent) correlate with an increased risk of mortality.16 The comparative safety of opioids compared to other drugs (for example non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) in older adults is questionable17 and prescribing high-dose opioids long term carries greater risk for misuse.18 While chronic pain of itself does not kill, prescribing opioids particularly in high doses and in conjunction with other sedatives like benzodiazepines does increase the mortality risk.2,3,16,18
Table 1 presents strategies for managing potential opioid-related adverse effects. Perceived risks (noting an absence of adverse opioid effects) and how they are addressed and managed should be documented in the treatment plan during regular clinical reviews.
When longer-term opioid treatment goals have not been met, treatment should be discontinued. This process is facilitated by having a pre-arranged treatment plan with the patient. Explain the need to stop opioids and set a reasonable timeline for gradual reduction of the dose (for example 10–20 mg morphine equivalent per week). Review the patient weekly and ensure they receive additional support during this time (for example supportive therapies like massage, hydrotherapy and counselling) and monitor the patient's mental state, as some people can experience mood disturbance during opioid withdrawal. In some cases, advice from a pain and/or addiction medicine specialist may be warranted. Temporary 'setbacks' may occur but should be contained and the goal of completing opioid withdrawal should be maintained.
Opioids are not universal painkillers but may have a role in managing persistent non-malignant pain for appropriately selected patients. Once commenced, ongoing evaluation of safety (adverse opioid events) and efficacy (with documentation) should guide clinical management. A treatment plan that incorporates the possibility of, and process for, stopping opioids is essential. For many patients, long-term opioid use may not prove safe and effective.
* Diversion of a drug means that it has been given or sold to, or taken by, a person for whom it was not prescribed
Dr McDonough occasionally acts as a medical adviser to Reckitt-Benckiser regarding the use of buprenorphine in opioid addiction treatment.
The following statements are either true or false.
1. Tramadol should be avoided in patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
2. Opioid doses above 200 mg are associated with an increased risk of death.
Answers to self-test questions
Director, Addiction Medicine and Toxicology, Western Hospital Melbourne