You can find points for reflection in your individual report if you have received one, or in the sample report.
- Reflect on your practice and your requests for imaging of the low back
- Reflect on your data in relation to your patients and their indications for imaging
- Access a sample report
About the Practice Review
The Practice Review is a four-page report regularly mailed to GPs in Australia. Its purpose is to support you in your professional development and quality improvement. Each report focuses on a specific clinical area and includes:
- background information about the clinical area of focus
- your individual utilisation of MBS tests or dispensing data for PBS medicines
- evidence-based points for reflection
- aggregate data of GPs working in similar practices across Australia for comparison
- additional data from the MedicineInsight general practice database to provide insights into the condition/s for which medicines or tests have been requested; this provides context to help you further interpret your data
How have your requests for lumbosacral imaging changed over time?
In the financial year 2017–18, 12 of your patients received a lumbosacral X-ray and 9 of your patients received a lumbosacral CT scan
My data do not look as I’d expect, why could this be?
Data represents lumbosacral X-rays and CT scans that you requested and that were performed. If your numbers are lower than you expect, it may be that:
- you are requesting lumbosacral images, but your patients are not having them performed.
If your numbers are higher than you expect, it may be that:
- you requested lumbosacral images before the financial year 2017–18, but your patients had them performed during the financial year 2017–18
Help me reflect on my data
- What factors do I consider when referring a patient for a lumbosacral image?
- Of my patients who received a lumbosacral image, how many had one or more alerting features (red flags) that made me suspect a potentially serious spinal pathology?
- How do I manage patients who expect an image of their lower back when it is not clinically indicated?
What do these graphs show me?
- Figure 1 shows the total number of lumbosacral X-rays that you requested and that were performed, expressed as a rate per 1000 patients.
- Figure 2 shows the total number of lumbosacral CT scans that you requested and that were performed, expressed as a rate per 1000 patients.
- The request rate per 1000 patients is shown for financial years 2014–15, 2015–16, 2016–17, 2017–18.
- Numbers have been adjusted to represent a rate per 1000 patients to provide relative comparisons with the median GP in your RA.
- The purpose of this graph is to show you the trend in your requests for imaging of the low back over time compared to your peers.
I have an asterisk on my graph, what does this mean?
- An asterisk on a column in the graph indicates that your data for that year are above the range that can be represented in the graph.
- This graph is scaled to fit 90% of the data from all GPs.
My data do not look as I’d expect. Why could this be?
The graphs represent the number of lumbosacral X-rays or CT scans as a rate per 1000 patients to allow comparison between GPs with varying numbers of patients.If your requests for lumbosacral X-rays or CT scans are higher than you expect, this may be because:
- your total number of patients is lower than average.
For example, if you
- requested 5 lumbosacral X-rays in 2017–18
- have 500 patients in total for that financial year
then the rate of your lumbosacral X-rays per 1000 patients (green bar) = (5/500) * 1000 = 10
- you requested an X-ray or CT scan prior to the financial year 2017-18, but your patients had them performed during the financial year 2017–18.
- your total number of patients is higher than average.
For example, if you:
- requested 6 lumbosacral X-rays in 2017–18
- have 2000 patients in total for that financial year
then the rate of your lumbosacral X-rays per 1000 patients (green bar) = (6/2000) * 1000 = 3
- you are requesting X-rays and/or CT scans, but your patients are not having them performed.
Help me reflect on my data
- Have my requests for lumbosacral imaging changed over the last 4 years?
- What are the reasons my imaging requests may have changed?
- Am I requesting more images of the low back than my peers?
- What is my approach to diagnosing low back pain as non-specific?
What does MedicineInsight tell us?
MedicineInsight data show that of all patients with low back pain, 41% received an X-ray, 56% received a CT scan and 20% received an MRI.
- How does this data compare to your estimate of patients who received an image of their lower back?
Aggregate MedicineInsight data as at 1 September 2018. Request for low back imaging and reference to relevant indication must be in the 12 months before this date.
Who did you request a lumbosacral image for in 2017–18?
What does this graph show me?
- This graph shows the age distribution of your patients who received an image of their lower back in the financial year 2017–18.
- Data is shown for the age groups 10–29 years, 30–44 years, 45–59 years, 60–74 years and 75+ years
- The number of patients in each age group is shown as a percentage of all patients who received a lumbosacral X-ray or CT scan.
- Within each age group, percentage of patients who were male (purple bar) and female (orange bar) are shown.
- The purpose of this graph is to provide you with more data about your patients who received a lumbosacral X-ray or CT scan in 2017–18.
Help me interpret and reflect on my data
- What is my overall patient demographic (eg, older or younger patients)? Does this affect the number people I see with low back pain?
- When do I consider referring a patient with low back pain for imaging?
- How do I discuss a diagnosis of non-specific low back pain with my patients?
Age profile of patients in your practice
What does this graph show?
- This graph shows the breakdown by age group of the total number of your patients who received a category 1 (ie, professional attendances) or category 5 (diagnostic imaging services) Medicare benefit between 1 July 2017 and 30 June 2018.
- The purpose of this graph is to give you a snapshot of your patients to help you interpret your data.
- The shaded blue area lies between the 25th and 75th percentile for the age profiles of patients of GP practices in your RA.
- Your RA peer group is identified.
I have an asterisk on my graph. What does this mean?
- An asterisk on the age profile graph indicates that your data is above the range that can be represented in the graph, ie, you have more than 800 patients in the age group above which the asterisk has been placed.
- This graph is scaled to fit 90% of the data from all GPs.
Your Medicare patients and concession card holders
What does this table show?
- This table shows the total number of unique patients that you have seen over a standard 3-month period.
- The table gives the total number of patients who received a category 1 (ie, professional attendances) or category 5 (diagnostic imaging services) Medicare benefit, and the total number of patients who used a concession card or safety net card to have a prescription written by you dispensed.
- The purpose of this table is to provide you with a snapshot of your patients to help you interpret some of the data presented in the graphs and tables in this report.
- This information is from 1 April 2018 to 30 June 2018.
- The median for GPs in your RA is also provided.
Frequently asked questions
I would like to know more
- Find out more about our national program and access a range of CPD activities and patient resources
- Book an educational visit – Low back pain: taking action
- Read the MedicineWise News: Patient-centred, pragmatic prescribing for acute non-specific low back pain
- Access the case study: Taking action for acute low back pain
- Download a ‘Low back pain recovery plan’ for your patients
More questions? Want to give feedback?
Send us an email at firstname.lastname@example.org or call (02) 8217 8700
- Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet 2017;389:736-47.
- Rheumatology Expert Group. Therapeutic Guidelines: Low back pain. West Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Ltd, 2017 (accessed 7 May 2018).
- Bardin LD, King P, Maher CG. Diagnostic triage for low back pain: a practical approach for primary care. Med J Aust 2017;206:268-73.
- NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. Management of people with acute low back pain: model of care. Chatswood: NSW Health, 2016 (accessed 1 March 2018).
- Williams CM, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, et al. Low back pain and best practice care: A survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:271-7.
- Almeida M, Saragiotto B, Richards B, et al. Primary care management of non-specific low back pain: key messages from recent clinical guidelines. Med J Aust 2018;208:272-5.
- Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:811-6.
- Traeger A, Buchbinder R, Harris I, et al. Diagnosis and management of low-back pain in primary care. CMAJ 2017;189:E1386-E95.
- Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018;391:2356-2367.
- Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA 2010;303:1295-302.