Faecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease
Faecal calprotectin (FC) is a marker of inflammation in the gut and can help to differentiate between non-inflammatory conditions (eg, irritable bowel syndrome) and inflammatory diseases (eg, irritable bowel disease). FC can be used to assist with clinical decision making in IBD management.
- FC is a surrogate marker of intestinal inflammation which can assist in the differentiation of noninflammatory conditions (eg, irritable bowel syndrome) from inflammatory diseases (eg, IBD) thereby guiding the selection of patients requiring further investigations.1
- FC can be used to assist with clinical decision making in IBD management.2
- FC levels < 100 micrograms/g correspond to mucosal healing/histological remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) and luminal Crohn Disease (CD).3
- FC prior to therapeutic de-escalation is inversely related to risk of relapse; FC levels > 100 micrograms/g are associated with higher risk of relapse within 1 year.4
- Elevated FC correlates with endoscopic inflammation in UC and CD, with FC levels > 250 micrograms/g differentiating active disease from remission (sensitivity 80%, specificity 82%).5
- In CD affecting the small bowel without affecting the colon, accuracy of FC may be lower; patients with isolated small bowel CD may have normal FC despite active disease.6
- FC levels may begin to rise 3 months before symptoms of relapse become apparent.7
Use of FC in clinical decision making for patients with diagnosed IBD
Symptomatic patient | Asymptomatic patient | ||||
Exclude gastrointestinal infection | |||||
Faecal calprotectin test | Faecal calprotectin test as part of regular monitoring 6 monthly | ||||
< 100 μg/g | 100–250 μg/g | > 250 μg/g | < 100 μg/g | 100–250 μg/g | > 250 μg/g |
Consider non-inflammatory cause for symptoms. | Intermediate result – see below. | Indicative of active disease. Consider escalation of IBD treatment. | Indicative of mucosal healing/ remission. Continue current therapy. Wean/cease corticosteroids if patient is still taking these. Consider de-escalation of therapy if indicated based on the clinical scenario. | Intermediate result – see below. | Indicative of intestinal inflammation. Exclude gastrointestinal infection. Consider further evaluation of disease activity eg, imaging, endoscopy. Consider escalation of IBD treatment. |
Team communication
General practitioners are often the first point of contact for patients with IBD. Clear communication between gastroenterologists and other team members regarding the use and interpretation of FC testing can facilitate timely and appropriate access to testing as part of the treatment plan.
References
- Gastroenterological Society of Australia. Clinical update for general practitioners and physicians: Inflammatory bowel disease. Melbourne: GESA, 2018 (accessed 9 February 2021).
- Lamb CA, et al. Gut 2019;68:s1-s106.
- Guardiola J, et al. Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition) 2018;41:514–29.
- Buisson A, et al. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis 2019;13:1012–24.
- Lin J-F, et al. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 2014;20:1407–15.
- Gecse KB, et al. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015;50:841–7.
- Maaser C, et al. J Crohns Colitis 2019;13:144–64.
- Colombel J-F, et al. The Lancet 2017;390:2779–89.
Download the original pdf of this article
Back to Inflammatory bowel disease resources hub